Vanishing Point is Scotland’s foremost artist-led independent theatre company, internationally recognised and acclaimed for its distinctive, ground-breaking and visionary work. Our mission is to create world class, international theatre, led by director Matthew Lenton.
‘one of the UK’s most singular theatre companies’ The Guardian
Established in 1999, the Company has developed an international reputation for creating bold and ambitious performances that are visceral, visual and entertaining. We explore our contemporary society through a unique lens of abstraction, imagery and text, creating worlds that resemble our own, but are magical and sometimes surreal. We produce highly visual, multimedia theatre infused with haunting poetic visions.
‘an international force’ The Herald
Our perspective is international and multicultural. We collaborate with artists and producers from other countries and cultures, us travelling to them and them to us, thereby enriching life experiences, artistic experiences, the diversity of our respective cultures and the experience of our audiences. We create work that overcomes language barriers and communicates across cultures.
‘In overcoming differences of language, Lenton has developed a theatre of soundless voyeurism, defying every rule of drama… brave and relentless, terrible and necessary’ The Scotsman on Wonderland
Our work has been created and performed in over 20 countries with leading international festivals and venues including Edinburgh International Festival, Buenos Aires International Festival, Santiago A Mil, BOZAR Arts (Brussels), Theatre de la Ville (Paris), Stanislavsky Season Festival (Moscow), National Theatre of Portugal (Porto) & Brighton Festival.
There is no formula to the way we work. We think that if our shows start to resemble each other closely, it's because we're not striving hard enough to find a truthful connection between form and content - the content of each new show is different. So too should the form be. Simply, each time we begin working on a show, we create form and content together, so that each influences and unlocks the other.
If there is something constant in our work, it is an attraction to abstraction, visual and aural poetry and a rejection of naturalism. There is also the rejection of conventional ‘structure’ and received notions of what ‘drama’ or ‘a play’ should be and there is the appeal of darkness, imaginative and physical.
There is the belief that there should be space for an audience to ‘dream on’ to what they see, that not everything should be explained, that not everything is explainable.
There is the belief that watching our work should be like watching dance, without the apparent choreography but with the same meticulous significance of action, or like standing in front of a painting, which begins to move when somebody plays some music. But not like a play.
There is a belief in hard work and a commitment to supporting artists who do not come from a background of privilege or wealth.
There is a belief that ‘doing it your own way’ is better than going through the system.
There is the belief that critics should engage with the invitation the artist is making, and not judge things by their own standards.
There is a belief in the mystery and privacy of the creative and artistic process. It is not something we want to share with everyone. The rehearsal room is an intimate, private place where, primarily, everyone must feel comfortable – to experiment, to make mistakes, to discover, to improvise, play and finally to make something beautiful, moving and mysterious for audiences.
There is a belief that creativity and creative thinking runs through everything and belongs to everyone - not only the artists making the shows, but the producers, operational team and technicians, whose creative thinking and big ideas help propel the company forward.
To find our upcoming work and opportunities, sign up to our mailing list.
Performers We are unable to accept unsolicited C.V.'s However, if you would like to invite us to see your work, please invite us by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org. We receive many invitations so unfortunately we can’t R.S.V.P to every invitation.
Directors We regularly recruit for Assistant Directors for our productions. Any opportunities will be advertised here and via our social media channels.
Designers If you are a set, lighting, sound, AV or costume designer and would like to worth with us, please send us your C.V. along with information about your work to email@example.com. If we are interested in working with you, we will try to see your work.
Production staff If you are a Production Manager, Stage Manager or Technician and would like to work with us, please send your C.V. and covering letter to firstname.lastname@example.org and we will contact you should any suitable opportunities arise.
Job Vacancies We don't currently have any vacancies.
Making our work
Naturally, it begins with an idea about something. It can be an image, a dream, a piece of text, even a feeling. Usually, it is something rooted in social reality, a subject which, through the course of creation, is ‘filtered through a unique lens of abstraction’.
The idea or subject matter is explored through an initial development week, when possible. After that week, there is a period for reflection and consideration before a further development period. During this second period, we go into more depth and become a little more focused on the ideas that have interested us. Also at this stage, we bring things into the rehearsal room - whatever it might be - that can help us develop further the form we are interested in. For example, for Tomorrow, we began experimenting with the prosthetic masks, which were to become such an important part of the show.
For Interiors, which takes place behind a large window, we started to work with a cheap, transparent shower curtain that helped us make discoveries about how this idea could work. For The Destroyed Room, we introduced cameras, live feeds, monitors and projectors. The introduction of these elements begins to influence the formation of the work and a distinctive language begins to emerge. All the time, actors are improvising and generating material. Sometimes these improvisations are carefully structured. More often they are chaotic, sometimes fruitless, occasionally brilliant, but always persistent, conducted - as they are happening - by the director. Sometimes the actors are improvising directly with each other, sometimes with the elements in the room, until gradually, we begin to get a sense of how these elements can come together to create a poetic whole. During this period, our designers begin to experiment with scenic, visual, video and sound design. The final development period is the rehearsal period, which leads up to the first previews of the show. Even after previews, the show continues to evolve as the audience begins to influence the work.
Performance, the nature of performance, changes from show to show and so does the notion of ‘acting’. ‘Acting’ is whatever it needs to be to achieve the thing you need to achieve. For example, Interiors takes place behind a glass screen, as if the audience is looking in on the action around a dinner table. The audience can see the performers, but cannot hear them. This was not a sound-proofed box, as many people thought, but the actors effectively muting their voices and speaking to each other naturally, but completely silently - the result of a great deal of work. It involved a keen sense of peripheral awareness (a common element in our work) and the rejection of many ‘rules’ about acting or performance. For example, if one actor spoke to another in an improvisation, she might say, ‘How’s your mother, I’ve heard she’s ill in hospital?’ The second actor will, of course, have no idea of what the first has said, but must commit to a response nevertheless. He might say, ‘Yes, I saw it last night, it was really good’. So the conversation doesn’t make sense in a conventional way, but begins to build up a picture for the viewer, within the context of a visual story. This was a challenging experience for the actors, deprived of their voices and of direct contact with an audience. Nuanced, sometimes even microscopic, physical action became crucial, as did an understanding of what was needed physically to help express an idea (that the audience wouldn’t otherwise understand) without reverting to mime. The discipline and technique involved in this is considerable. Finally, a conclusion that would normally take two actors forty lines of dialogue to reach convincingly, could only take three or four – otherwise the audience would simply see two people taking, without any idea of what they were talking about. This meant actors sometimes feeling they were not convincing each other. They had to make a leap, to accept that ‘time’ was somehow accelerated when they were ‘in the room’. And they became good at this kind of ‘acting’.
Tomorrow involves the actors wearing realistic prosthetic masks, which are strikingly placed onto them during the show, so that the audience is completely aware of the young actor beneath. This was the central metaphor of the show and it meant some very good actors spending a lot of time sitting quite still in masks. The actors could not speak convincingly in the masks, because voices were too muffled, so we had to discover ways in which speech took on different qualities. Once again, this began to change preconceptions about ‘performance’ or ‘acting’. The show became more and more abstract and ‘musical’.
These are just two examples of how the nature of performance is constantly changing and evolving within our ‘process’ – being re-invented each time.
Actors are at the centre of our work - their improvisations generate a great deal of the material for the shows - yet in a performance they are one element of the architecture in which scenic, visual and aural elements are at least equally important. One critic, Joyce McMillan, said of our work, ‘in a sense, what Matthew Lenton is producing is no longer living theatre. In overcoming differences of language, he has developed a theatre of soundless voyeurism that robs actors of the chance to connect directly with audiences. What emerges instead is a visual and aural poem’. This may or may not be true (we like to think it is!) yet actors remain the lifeblood of the creation process. Their work interacts and intertwines with that of the other artists, who help to create a unique, distinctive and constantly evolving architecture on the stage.
In the end, we think of our process as being like ‘writing in 3-D’. Critics (in the UK at least) often still seek to know who the ‘text’ was by, to ascribe main authorship to the person who wrote the words on the page. But our work is really not made like this. It really is more like a potter who throws a lump of clay onto a wheel. She might not know exactly what she is making, but she knows what she doesn’t want to make. So she pulls off pieces of clay and when she’s ready, begins to shape something, until finally the form appears. This process is collaborative, but not a democracy. The main author, the orchestrator, of Vanishing Point’s work, is the director.
Information For Promoters
To enable us to better realise our artistic vision and to celebrate diversity and cultural exchange we aim to continually develop new relationships with partners, collaborators, co-producers and audiences across the world.
Led by Artistic Director, Matthew Lenton, we work with a regular team of creative associates and have developed work and toured our productions around the world, including Brazil, Russia, China and across Europe. We work with students, independent artists, small, mid & large scale venues and festivals across the world.